Nuclear Energy is the Solution - Redux

Author :

An essay I read entitled What's Wrong with Energy Investing made me realize that nuclear energy is just not being seen as the solution to the world's energy problems.

  Comments: 3

Bill Aulet, a senior lecturer at MIT's Sloan School of Management and Entrepreneur in Residence at the MIT Entrepreneurship Center just wrote an interesting over at a new Blog called xconomy entitled What's Wrong with Energy Investing? Part I.  In it he says that the problem with energy investing is that too much capital is going into renewable resources which really don't promise to move the energy needle or help the planet anytime soon.  Humanity has pressing needs and we aren't working to solve it.  He writes:
"The biggest part of the energy riddle that needs to be solved resides-and will continue to reside for the next 50 years-with the hydrocarbon side. How do we find more to meet the booming demand? And, how do we find ways, through technology, process, and/or business-model innovation, to reduce the environmental impact of hydrocarbon usage? Renewables is a rounding error when compared to the 80 to 90 percent of the demand that hydrocarbons (i.e., oil, gas, coal-ah!, there it is the four-letter word of energy) fill and will continue to fill for the foreseeable future."

I was surprised that he never mentioned nuclear as a solution.  As I wrote in a previous essay, nuclear is a viable option that has already proven itself.  It is a fundamental force in the universe and already produces 17% of the world's electricity from 442 commercial reactors.  In the United States, 20% of the country's electricity is produced using nuclear energy.

Boosting fossil fuel extraction and efficiency is a short, short term solution but for the medium and long-term, nuclear energy is the only answer.


Previous Comments

PhilR, October 18, 2007

Thanks Bill. I appreciate you stopping by.

Helpful? Yes:0 / No:1
Is this review helpful? Yes No

Bill Aulet, October 08, 2007


I just found this post now. You are correct. I should have mentioned nuclear as well. It is part of the solution.


Helpful? Yes:0 / No:1
Is this review helpful? Yes No

David Walsh, August 11, 2007

There still seem to be problems with nuclear, look at the earthquake in Japan. I've also read that nuclear is still not cost efficient and costs twice as much as fossil fuels.

Helpful? Yes:0 / No:1
Is this review helpful? Yes No

Related Articles

Find the best Savings or CD Rate

Advertiser Disclaimer. Some of the savings offers appearing on this site are from advertisers from which this website receives compensation for being listed here. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear).

Financial products of all nature bear inherent risks and this website is not a financial advisory service. provides information related to rates on US-based savings accounts, CD (certificate of deposit) rates, money market accounts, money market funds, government bonds, other bonds and income producing securities, commodities, equity securities, mortgage rates, home equity rates and auto loans rates, free of charge to internet users for their independent use. The accuracy of information on the website is not guaranteed, and no financial product of any sort is endorsed. On certain web pages, may contain discussion and analysis of the risks and rewards associated with certain financial instruments, including equity instruments, or may link to other pages with such discussions. The information should not be construed to provide investment advice. In fact, users are specifically warned against following any advice related to specific instruments, including advice that may be on other web pages linked from Please seek personalized advice on the risks and applicability to your own circumstances of any financial product from a qualified professional. ©, LLC, 2015.