The Joke Behind Bonuses

Article Submitted by: DanS
Careers


Tags: Bonuses.

The argument in almost all sectors, especially the financial, has always been that if you do not give highly-valued employees bonuses these same people will go elsewhere and productivity will drop measurably. Today, bonuses are the accepted currency for highly paid and valued employees. No one challenges the assumptions underlying them. But, they have always been a joke, and they are much more so today.

 

Submitted: Feb 1, 2009    Views: 254    Comments: 1    Likes: 3   


 

The argument in almost all sectors, especially the financial, has always been that if you do not give highly-valued employees bonuses these same people will go elsewhere and productivity will drop measurably.   Today, bonuses are the accepted currency for highly paid and valued employees.  No one challenges the assumptions underlying them.  But, they have always been a joke, and they are much more so today.

 

The basis for bonuses is simply that people will go where they can earn the most and to be competitive they must be offered compensation at least equal to the very best in the marketplace.  It assumes that all workers will pick up and leave as soon as their earnings become less or even slightly less than the norm in a sector.  Absent from such thinking is the concept of people working for a company because they want to, are fascinated by the work of the company, and enjoy the colleagues and culture of the enterprise. Such people, without a bonus structure, would be likely to remain even if they earned somewhat less than the competitors. Also absent is the ridiculous assumption that there are infinite jobs out there and that anyone can pick up and leave when they perceive it in their best financial interests.  Bonuses are and have been just a way to perpetuate high earnings for the richest among us. 

 

Today, however, bonuses are an absolute joke.  With unemployment rising daily, can anyone, at any level, imagine leaving a job because bonuses have been eliminated or withheld?  The bonus mania in the banks today is not just a subject for ridicule, it has no merit whatsoever.  It is highly unlikely that any senior people in banks and brokerages will quit their jobs because they did not get a bonus this year.  Spending $20 billion on bonuses, as the banks that received tax payer subsidies did in 2008, was to perpetuate a silly and unnecessary practice in a time when the people getting them were probably praying, very simply, that they would still be employed in 2009. 

 

It would be a very good idea if bonuses were eliminated across the board.  The economic crisis is a good excuse for dropping them entirely.

 

 


Sponsor Updates and Offers

Sign up for Zions Direct’s free weekly newsletter.

Get market information, CD and Bond auction updates, new-issue alerts and more.



Related Articles:



3

Email this story Email to someone | Print Story Print Content | Add to reading list

Comments Received:

Palmer
(Unregistered)

Totally agree. It really irritates me when Wall Street says they have to pay out bonuses to keep their best people. Where are they going to go? Sure, they could go to a smaller, mid-level investment bank but the money there won't be any better.

Say no to taxpayer subsidized bonuses.

Posted: Feb 1, 2009



Add Your Comments:

Your Name:

Spam protection control:


© Copyright 2010 DanS All rights reserved. DanS has granted BestCashCow.com, LLC non-exclusive rights to display this work on Bestcashcow.com.

Financial products of all nature bear inherent risks and this website is not a financial advisory service; it is a forum for users to share and to compare notes and observations on financial publications. The website provides, free of charge, the technical and logistical apparatus and the medium for users to share and to publish financial information and to comment on publications. As such, the website's operator can not and does not take responsibility for information, observations or opinions of any sort or nature provided by third parties with whom it is not affiliated who use the website to publish, to comment or as a means of solicitation. Users are specifically warned against following any advice related to specific instruments, including, but not limited to, equity securities, that may be provided by other users directly on this site or on web pages to which other users have provided links on this site. BestCashCow.com can not and does not check or verify the qualifications and credentials of users who publish or comment on this site or on linked pages. Users should seek personalized advice from qualified professionals regarding all personal financial issues and evaluate the risks and applicability to their own circumstances of each financial product discussed regardless of who the publisher is or purports to be. Should you, through your use of this site, identify an individual or organization purporting to offer personalized advice, you bear all responsibility to ensure that the individual or organization has the qualifications that they may represent on the website, and that their advice is appropriate for your circumstances. On certain webpages, BestCashCow.com provides information related to rates on US-based savings accounts, CDs, short-term government bonds, and other US cash equivalent securities, also free of charge to internet users for their independent use. The accuracy of this information is not guaranteed, and the information, like all other information on this website, should not be construed to provide investment advice, nor to endorse a financial product of any sort.

© 2010 BestCashCow.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy.