Robert Murdoch Buys The Wall Street Journal and Public Approves

Article Submitted by: Sam Cass
News


Despite the media hype to the contrary, the public long ago approved the sale of Dow Jones and the Wall Street Journal to Mr. Murdoch. Here's why.

 

Submitted: Aug 1, 2007    Views: 305    Comments: 3    Likes: 10   


The saga of Rupert Murdoch's courtship of the Wall Street Journal has excited the media but most of the paper's readers and the public have already tacitly approved the sale.  There are no screams of protest or cries that the freedom of the press is being undermined.  There are a few reasons for this:

 

  • Ownership is moot to the average reader.  As long as the paper continues to be a credible source of business information, we generally don't care who owns and publishes it.
  • Business news is everywhere.  If the paper stops becoming a credible source, there are plenty of other places to go.
  • Rupert Murdoch is a pretty shrewd businessman.  So why shouldn't he own one of the largest business publications.  Is anyone better qualified?
  • Everyone has a bias.  Sure Murdoch will bring his personal biases into the paper but doesn't everyone associated with the paper bring their bias? 
  • People like what Murdoch has done with Fox News.  Love him or hate him, he's created an entertaining channel that provides a counterweight to the perceived liberal bias of the other news shows.
  • He's Web-hip.  Murdoch owns MySpace, and the public realizes that he understands the importance of technology, and can help the Wall Street Journal navigate its increasingly digital future.

 

So, don't expect to see lots of protest as this deal closes.  A true businessman has bought a media company that reports on business.  Is there anything more appropriate?




Related Articles:



10

Email this story Email to someone | Print Story Print Content | Add to reading list

Comments Received:

Frazer1

I was watching CNBC last night. They clearly are concerned that this is a real threat to their franchise (their revenue is $250 - $300 million per year easily and it will be shaved in half immediately). A guest on the show from Forbes who used to work for the WSJ made a series of great points. He said that the Bankcroft family has always had this mistaken idea that Dow Jones had a higher calling - to be the final source of info on everything. They however never understood that their client base is a financial one that is trying to get an edge on markets through information that is stimulating. And, they never understood that the client base might have other broader interests (the Weekend edition is really just a real estate advertising supplement). With any luck, Murdoch will make the paper more stimulating and broader like the Financial Times, and (no matter what you think of the guy) if that happens, there is nothing to protest.

Posted: Aug 1, 2007

Rob Davis

The public doesn't care about the Wall Street Journal or Murdoch. The Wall Street Journal will continue as a publication for rich people and Murdoch will continue as a ultra-wealthy media baron. Wealthy people read the paper for news, not political opinion. Who cares?

Posted: Aug 4, 2007

Inkunmingnow

The answer is: people are stupid, delusional or on medication. All the rest have either moved to Canada or thrown out their TV sets and cancelled their newspaper subscriptions long ago. The state of America's decay is almost beyond comprehension.

Posted: Aug 4, 2007



Add Your Comments:

Your Name:

Spam protection control:


© Copyright 2008 Sam Cass All rights reserved. Sam Cass has granted BestCashCow.com, LLC non-exclusive rights to display this work on Bestcashcow.com.

Financial products of all nature bear inherent risks and this website is not a financial advisory service; it is a forum for users to share and to compare notes and observations on financial publications. The website provides, free of charge, the technical and logistical apparatus and the medium for users to share and to publish financial information and to comment on publications. As such, the website’s operator can not and does not take responsibility for information, observations or opinions of any sort or nature provided by third parties with whom it is not affiliated who use the website to publish, to comment or as a means of solicitation. Users are specifically warned against following any advice related to specific instruments, including, but not limited to, equity securities, that may be provided by other users directly on this site or on web pages to which other users have provided links on this site. BestCashCow.com can not and does not check or verify the qualifications and credentials of users who publish or comment on this site or on linked pages. Users should seek personalized advice from qualified professionals regarding all personal financial issues and evaluate the risks and applicability to their own circumstances of each financial product discussed regardless of who the publisher is or purports to be. Should you, through your use of this site, identify an individual or organization purporting to offer personalized advice, you bear all responsibility to ensure that the individual or organization has the qualifications that they may represent on the website, and that their advice is appropriate for your circumstances. On certain webpages, BestCashCow.com provides information related to rates on US-based savings accounts, CDs, short-term government bonds, and other US cash equivalent securities, also free of charge to internet users for their independent use. The accuracy of this information is not guaranteed, and the information, like all other information on this website, should not be construed to provide investment advice, nor to endorse a financial product of any sort.

© 2007 BestCashCow.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy.