View Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/20/us/politics/20mayor.html?hp
Sponsor Updates and Offers
|
|
|
Related Articles:

Investing, Stocks, Income, Dividends, Value, Buffett, Passive, Retirements, Economy, Dividend, Retirement, Bank, Banks, Money, Recession, Stock, Stock market, Market, Personal finance, Investment, Inflation, Savings, Credit, Checking, Interest rates.
I like Bloomberg. I think he is a fantastic leader and has served the City of New York exceptionally well during its recovery and growth for the last several years. I also think that he would be a spectacular President, but I am concerned that he is never really going to have the national appeal required to get elected. I am concerned that he may inadvertently play the role of spoiler for Giuliani, handing the Presidency to Clinton (as Perot did in 92 and 96) or to Barack Hussein. A Democrat President and a Democrat Congress would be a disaster for our economy, especially for the health care industry.
Submitted: Jun 20, 2007 Views: 453 Comments: 4 Likes: 4
View Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/20/us/politics/20mayor.html?hp
|
|
|
Email to someone |
Print Content |
Add to reading list
I personally don't think he stands a chance. Independent candidates never win although they can influence elections - a la Ross Perot.
Posted: Jun 20, 2007
I think he changes the chemistry and that we will see shifts now in the ordering of the others. Guliani is going to have trouble, as will Hillary.
Posted: Jun 20, 2007
This entire bit about a three-way race between Hillary Clinton, Guiliani and Bloomberg is starting to smell too much like a New York-centric media anxious to create a buzz about anything during a slow news period. It is entirely possible that none of them will have national appeal.
Posted: Jun 21, 2007
He is not running. He has been successful at everything and isn't going to risk failing at this. End of story.
Posted: Jun 21, 2007