With Bankruptcies Looming --- Brokerage Account Insurance Pitifully Insufficient and Getting Worse

Article Submitted by: Marc Freedman
Stocks - Options - Mutual Funds


In times like these, and stupidly only in times like these, people begin to look at the protection (insurance) coverage underwriting their own, individual brokerage accounts. And what one finds is a real eye opener. If you have more than $500K in a brokerage account, everything over that amount is totally unprotected. And this is as true for the big ones (Merrill and Citi/Smith Barney) as for the smaller ones (E*Trade and CD Ameritrade). If you don’t have more than a half million, you can rest easy. If you do, you are on your own. If this economy falls apart – if we move into severe recession and some banks go into bankruptcy – there is a real likelihood of loosing a lot of wealth – that means you, not just the guys with multiple millions.

 

Submitted: Dec 5, 2007    Views: 613    Comments: 2    Likes: 5   


In times like these, and stupidly only in times like these, people begin to look at the protection (insurance) coverage underwriting their own, individual brokerage accounts.  And what one finds is a real eye opener.  If you have more than $500K in a brokerage account, everything over that amount is totally unprotected.   And this is as true for the big ones (Merrill and Citi/Smith Barney) as for the smaller ones (E*Trade and TD Ameritrade).   If you don’t have more than a half million, you can rest easy.  If you do, you are on your own.  If this economy falls apart – if we move into severe recession and some banks go into bankruptcy – there is a real likelihood of loosing a lot of wealth – that means you, not just the guys with multiple millions.

 

Most brokerages belong to and fund the private SIPC (Securities Investor Protection Corporation), created in 1970.  SIPC covers the first $500K which includes $100K in cash and the rest in securities.  But, after that, most institutions have nothing or suggest they have another level that is so poorly funded (most are self insured policies) that what they offer is worthless.  The big guys, Smith Barney and Merrill proudly tout their second level coverage (after SIPC).  Both say they have $600 million additional insurance underwritten by Lloyds.  But, if you read carefully, that is not per account, but “in the aggregate.”  That means that they are carrying insurance on all their client accounts – in the trillions of dollars – in the amount of six hundred million dollars.  It is smoke, not real, and absolutely meaningless.  It is just plain misrepresentation.

 

Smith Barney and Merrill will agree, when pressed, that the Lloyd coverage isn’t worth much more than the paper it is written on, but they will also say that all client assets are segregated and not likely to fall into the hands of creditors in the event of a bankruptcy.  That’s probably true in most cases, but not good enough if we really have trouble – or if one of them really has trouble.  They could carry more insurance if pressed, and they could even offer individual clients the opportunity to buy their own additional insurance at very low cost.  But, no one is pressing them, and they are not independently stepping up to the plate.

 

Quite the contrary.  E*Trade which has been going through hell in recent weeks and which is still teetering (in spite of a recent infusion of new monies) appears to have just dropped the insurance – however meager – they were offering over and above the SIPC limits.  That’s incredible and to date unnoticed.  But, it gives you a good idea of what companies in trouble, even if they have some additional coverage, are likely to do.

 

Individuals need to ask more questions and get more savvy about this matter.  There are some things you can do now.  If you have more than $500K in an account, open up another one in another brokerage.  Or, transfer some assets to a spouse who also has a brokerage account.  Or, insist that your brokerage offer you additional insurance (though you are not likely to get very far).  Indeed, the best thing you can do to protect yourself is to split your moneys up among a number of brokerages. 




Related Articles:



5

Email this story Email to someone | Print Story Print Content | Add to reading list

Comments Received:

Found this Kiplinger's article on this topic http://www.kiplinger.com/columns/ask/archive/2007/q1115.htm

It suggests several reasons why the risks are small:

"brokers have to follow strict SEC rules about segregating the firm's money from the customers' investments. Even if the broker has financial trouble, the investors' money should still remain intact."

"That $500,000 limit only applies to the maximum amount SIPC will spend on its own to make up for any missing securities; not the total amount of money you can get back. If many of the customers' assets remain intact, you can get back a lot more than that SIPC limit."

So for a brokerage customer to lose their investments over $500k, it seems the brokerage would not only have to go bankrupt, but it would also have to be heavily involved in illegal practices (violating SEC rules). I'm sure there are cases where this has happened and will happen, but I'm not sure what the risk is.

Posted: Dec 5, 2007

I have read Kiplinger and Freedman, and I come down in favor of thinking about this and not just keeping a head in the sand. Sure, they are supposed to segregate and sure they have to be involved in inappropriate practices, but aren't we now facing a situation where many of these institutions were engaged in the sub-prime mess, fully knowing what they were doing? I for one believe it is pure foolishness to ignore the fact that most accounts are seriously unprotected beyond SIPC.

Posted: Dec 6, 2007



Add Your Comments:

Your Name:

Spam protection control:


© Copyright 2008 Marc Freedman All rights reserved. Marc Freedman has granted BestCashCow.com, LLC non-exclusive rights to display this work on Bestcashcow.com.

Financial products of all nature bear inherent risks and this website is not a financial advisory service; it is a forum for users to share and to compare notes and observations on financial publications. The website provides, free of charge, the technical and logistical apparatus and the medium for users to share and to publish financial information and to comment on publications. As such, the website’s operator can not and does not take responsibility for information, observations or opinions of any sort or nature provided by third parties with whom it is not affiliated who use the website to publish, to comment or as a means of solicitation. Users are specifically warned against following any advice related to specific instruments, including, but not limited to, equity securities, that may be provided by other users directly on this site or on web pages to which other users have provided links on this site. BestCashCow.com can not and does not check or verify the qualifications and credentials of users who publish or comment on this site or on linked pages. Users should seek personalized advice from qualified professionals regarding all personal financial issues and evaluate the risks and applicability to their own circumstances of each financial product discussed regardless of who the publisher is or purports to be. Should you, through your use of this site, identify an individual or organization purporting to offer personalized advice, you bear all responsibility to ensure that the individual or organization has the qualifications that they may represent on the website, and that their advice is appropriate for your circumstances. On certain webpages, BestCashCow.com provides information related to rates on US-based savings accounts, CDs, short-term government bonds, and other US cash equivalent securities, also free of charge to internet users for their independent use. The accuracy of this information is not guaranteed, and the information, like all other information on this website, should not be construed to provide investment advice, nor to endorse a financial product of any sort.

© 2007 BestCashCow.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy.