Amazon.com has filed a lawsuit challenging New York State’s new law forcing online retailers to collect sales tax on shipments to state residents.
Generally, only those companies that have a physical presence — like an office or store — in the state where the purchase is made are required to collect the tax.
The new law is based on a novel definition of what constitutes a presence in the state: It includes any Web site based in the state that earns a referral fee for sending customers to an online retailer.
I hope Amazon wins. If they don't, not only will it encourage more states to copy this law, but it will discourage online companies from having affiliates.
Submitted: May 5, 2008
Views: 131
Comments: 2
Likes: 2
View Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/02/nyregion/02amazon.html
Related Articles:
Amazon's Stock is Expensive Unless Free Cash Flow Doubles by soczie - Jun 20, 2007 eBay and Google Good; IAC, Amazon, Yahoo Bad by RobMinton - Jun 25, 2007 Analysts all Raise their Amazon Targets (Now that the Stock has already moved) by JRodgers - Jun 28, 2007 TiVo Users Can Get Amazon Movies From TV by Mass Market Tech - Jul 10, 2007 VCs Alarmed That Tax Treatment May Change by PhilR - Aug 13, 2007 Filing Taxes Early? You May Want to Slow Down by PhilR - Feb 10, 2008 Accountant or Software? by PhilR - Mar 16, 2008 Ben Stein on Private Equity tax cheats by walt - Jul 01, 2007 New York Real Estate Prices at New Heights by PhilR - Jul 03, 2007 New York City Housing Market Poised for a Bust by BankMan - Sep 03, 2008.
Email to someone |
Print Content |
Add to reading list
Comments Received:
NYer
(Unregistered)
NY's position is not only sound, but makes good business sense as it will encourage employment in state. I believe that they will win.
Posted: May 6, 2008
The main problem with the law is that it classifies an affiliate as a presence in the state. Thus, if Amazon had a NY affiliate, it would be considered to have a presence in NY. Affiliates though are totally independent companies. If I ran a business, I should not be made to pay taxes based on the business partnerships I have.
Posted: May 7, 2008