Apple iPad an iBomb

Article Submitted by: Mass Market Tech
Technology


The hype meter on the iPad device got so high over the past few weeks that we expected the new device to surf the web, cook a meal, and do the laundry. Unfortunately, the device doesn't do any of that, or anything at all that would make it succeed where other tablet devices have failed.

 

Submitted: Jan 27, 2010    Views: 320    Comments: 2    Likes: 4   


The hype meter on the iPad over the past few weeks that we expected the new device to surf the web, cook a meal, and do the laundry. Unfortunately, the device doesn't do any of that, or anything at all that would make it succeed where other tablet devices have failed.

What Apple delivered today is a device has a 9.7 inch display, weighs 1.5 pounds, and is half-an-inch thick. The device will use the iPhone operating system and will be powered by new chip made by Apple  a 1 GHz A4. Consumers have the option of 16Gb to 64 GB of storage. The device supports WiFi, has an accelerometer, compass, and built-in speaker and microphone, just like the iPhone. The screen is multi-touch screen. Jobs says that battery life is supposed to be 10 hours.

In addition to WiFi, it will have a 3G option from AT&T.

Here's the pricing. The Wifi-only version, with 16GB of memory, will cost $499. A 32GB version will be $599, 64 GB will be $699, and 64 GB  with 3G will cost $829 (for the 64GB version). AT&T will offer two data plans: $14.99 a month for 250 MB of data or $29.99 for unlimited.

Unlike the iPhone, the iPad will be unlocked, meaning you can use data plans from other carriers.

So, the question is, who needs this and what is it good for? The iPad will come with iBook store. The WSJ pointed out yesterday (member only content)  that publishers are giddy because they believe they can now lock consumers in at a higher price point. Really? I'm going to buy a book for $15.00 to read on this device? On top of the cost of the hardware and the expensive data plan? What happened to inexpensive ebooks? To me, the publishers just don't get it, but that's a whole separate article.

Plus, who wants to read a book on a backlit device> The reason the Kindle works as a reading device it because of its e-ink technology. It's easy on the eyes and like reading from paper. Reading a good novel on a computer screen is not my idea of fun.

Nor do I like the idea of reading from such a large computer device. I don't like having a full computer up against my body. I don't know about you but I can feel certain parts of my body tingling if a computer device gets too close. Once again, e-ink doesn't draw a lot of current so it's much less of a problem.

So what about other computer tasks? For $500 per month, I can get a pretty good netbook/laptop that comes with much more memory and has significantly more features. Indeed, Windows 7 even has touch screen technology built into it. Sure, it might not look as pretty but I'm not trying to win a beauty contest. I just want devices that work.

I predict the iPad will disappoint in sales. It exists in the category between a laptop and a cell-phone sized device. That's a tough spot - it doesn't have the power and functionality of a laptop but lacks the portability of a phone. To succeed at that size a device needs to have very specific applications. All general purpose tablets have failed. There's nothing that suggests the iPad will be any different.

Incidentally, couldn't they have chosen a better name? The product sound like some type of newfangled female sanitary product.

Consumers electronics is a notoriously fickle business. Product cycles are short and today's success is tomorrow's failure. Apple may have redefined several product categories over the last 10 years, but it isn't infallible.

 


Sponsor Updates and Offers

Sign up for Zions Direct’s free weekly newsletter.

Get market information, CD and Bond auction updates, new-issue alerts and more.



Related Articles:



4

Email this story Email to someone | Print Story Print Content | Add to reading list

Comments Received:

Alistaire
(Unregistered)

Quite possibly, perhaps, the worst and most inaccurate assessment of the new device to date:

"Indeed, Windows 7 even has touch screen technology built into it. Sure, it might not look as pretty but I'm not trying to win a beauty contest. I just want devices that work."

Seriously? I know not even where to begin with a statement like this.

Posted: Jan 28, 2010

I would tend to agree about your backlighting issue. Those using the device as a e-reader will probably not find the iPad as announced to be a serious alternative to the Kindle. And, my own hunch is that no device can be successful in the sector between an iPhone and a computer without offering an extraordinary leap-step in the way of voice and video. The iPad doesn't even purport to do either.

I am a big fan of Apple, but I will avoid this product (at least in its current form) just like I have avoid Apple TV.

Posted: Jan 30, 2010



Add Your Comments:

Your Name:

Spam protection control:


© Copyright 2010 Mass Market Tech All rights reserved. Mass Market Tech has granted BestCashCow.com, LLC non-exclusive rights to display this work on Bestcashcow.com.

Financial products of all nature bear inherent risks and this website is not a financial advisory service; it is a forum for users to share and to compare notes and observations on financial publications. The website provides, free of charge, the technical and logistical apparatus and the medium for users to share and to publish financial information and to comment on publications. As such, the website's operator can not and does not take responsibility for information, observations or opinions of any sort or nature provided by third parties with whom it is not affiliated who use the website to publish, to comment or as a means of solicitation. Users are specifically warned against following any advice related to specific instruments, including, but not limited to, equity securities, that may be provided by other users directly on this site or on web pages to which other users have provided links on this site. BestCashCow.com can not and does not check or verify the qualifications and credentials of users who publish or comment on this site or on linked pages. Users should seek personalized advice from qualified professionals regarding all personal financial issues and evaluate the risks and applicability to their own circumstances of each financial product discussed regardless of who the publisher is or purports to be. Should you, through your use of this site, identify an individual or organization purporting to offer personalized advice, you bear all responsibility to ensure that the individual or organization has the qualifications that they may represent on the website, and that their advice is appropriate for your circumstances. On certain webpages, BestCashCow.com provides information related to rates on US-based savings accounts, CDs, short-term government bonds, and other US cash equivalent securities, also free of charge to internet users for their independent use. The accuracy of this information is not guaranteed, and the information, like all other information on this website, should not be construed to provide investment advice, nor to endorse a financial product of any sort.

© 2010 BestCashCow.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy.