Is Web 2.0 A Bubble?

Article Submitted by: Mass Market Tech
Technology


Tags: Web.

Many seem to think web 2.0 is an overhyped bubble. But history has proven that wherever the audiences go, so goes the money.

 

Submitted: Jun 21, 2007    Views: 628    Comments: 5    Likes: 23   


Is Web 2.0 A Bubble?

In my opinion, the sale of MySpace to News Corp for $580 million in Mar 2006 kicked off the current round of web 2.0 expectations. The following sale of YouTube to Google for $1.6 billion only ratcheted up those expectations. There is no doubt that there is a lot of hype floating around the web 2.0 crowd these days, but it differs from the bubble years of 1999-2000 in several key ways:

  • Profitable companies are emerging. Unlike in 1999, many companies have proven that they can make a lot of money on the Web. Back at the end of the last century, this was not taken as a given. Although sites had tremendous traffic there was just the promise of future profit. Today, companies like Google, Yahoo, Ebay, and even Amazon make hundreds of millions, it not billions of dollars in the online space.
  • Advertising is coming online. Once again this was not a given in 1999. Many of the traditional companies were skeptical of online advertising and senior marketers were unsure or uncomfortable discussing web metrics. Most were not ready to take a risk on this untested medium. This attitude has changed significantly. Web advertising is growing rapidly, and companies both big and small are dedicating a bigger and bigger share of their budget to online. Online advertising will surpass or already has surpassed print, outdoor, and radio. As audio and video technology continues to develop, this migration will only continue. All of this money flowing into online provides the fuel for these web 2.0 companies.
  • Consumers are spending more time than ever online. More than 70% of the consumers in the US are online and they are spending more and more time accessing and interacting with the Web. Book buying, television watching, and other past-times are stagnant or in decline as people turn to online activities, news, and information to take up their time.

It's true that many web 2.0 companies are not profitable. But as most of the 1.0 companies have shown, if you can get a big audience, profitability does follow. And web 2.0 companies are grabbing large audiences. MySpace is one of the top three most trafficked sites and YouTube gets 60,000,000 visitors per day (according to StatBrain). It is not difficult to imagine the poster-children of web 2.0 - Digg, Facebook, MySpace, YouTube becoming hugely profitable when they decide to concentrate on monetizing their audiences. Advertisers will pay to get in front of such large audiences.

It is also not difficult to see how thousands of niche sites can and will be supported by the advertising dollars that will flow into the online space over the next 10 years.

Is there a lot of hype over web 2.0? Yes. Will every new web 2.0 company survive? No. But many of the companies will succeed, help millions of consumers, and become profitable, successful companies.




Related Articles:



23

Email this story Email to someone | Print Story Print Content | Add to reading list

Comments Received:

YouTube and some of the video sharing services may be overrated and seem a little bit like Broadcast.com plus 7 years. In my opinion, however, most Web 2.0 companies help to realize the true potential of the internet - enabling people to share information. Therefore, by and large, Web 2.0 has much less of a bubble quality that some of the earlier things that we have seen on the internet.

Posted: Jun 21, 2007

Author/Submitter Response:

I think there is definitely a bubble quality to it. I just think that some companies of real value will emerge. It won't necessarily be the front-runners. Google was a late entrant to web 1.0 and look at it now.

Very interesting article. I'd concur with the above comment. There is a compelling proposition to allowing the exchange of ideas and observations that will even outlast the proposition of online malls and garage sales (Amazon and EBay).

Posted: Jun 21, 2007

Author/Submitter Response:

Yeah, exchanging ideas and content is great but can it be monetized? Should it be monetized? I think those are the questions that need to be asked.

You are correct. Dynamic, user generated content is the future of the internet and advertisers will be willing to pay for it.

Posted: Jun 23, 2007

Author/Submitter Response:

I think so. Their is some advertiser reluctance to move into web 2.0 and user-generated content but that will change.

It's not a bubble but it will become increasingly harder for companies to break through. The falling cost of technology has caused a proliferation in online sites. Only a few will make it. It's the movie-start syndome brought to the web.

Posted: Jun 28, 2007

Author/Submitter Response:

I think marketing will be back en vogue. Sites will need to differentiate themselves beyond the technology. Technology has become commoditized. I may have to write an article about that.

Not a bubble just a lot of hype. None of these companies has, as of yet delivered any profit. Not even YouTube which gets like a zillion people a day on it.

That Arrington guy highlights companies that are mostly junk. I wouldn't spend two minutes using most of them. I'm surprised I actually spend any time on this site.

Posted: Jul 11, 2007

Author/Submitter Response:

These companies will make money. This is the same thing we heard about web 1.0 and plenty are not making lots of money - Google, Yahoo, etc.



Add Your Comments:

Your Name:

Spam protection control:


© Copyright 2008 Mass Market Tech All rights reserved. Mass Market Tech has granted BestCashCow.com, LLC non-exclusive rights to display this work on Bestcashcow.com.

Financial products of all nature bear inherent risks and this website is not a financial advisory service; it is a forum for users to share and to compare notes and observations on financial publications. The website provides, free of charge, the technical and logistical apparatus and the medium for users to share and to publish financial information and to comment on publications. As such, the website’s operator can not and does not take responsibility for information, observations or opinions of any sort or nature provided by third parties with whom it is not affiliated who use the website to publish, to comment or as a means of solicitation. Users are specifically warned against following any advice related to specific instruments, including, but not limited to, equity securities, that may be provided by other users directly on this site or on web pages to which other users have provided links on this site. BestCashCow.com can not and does not check or verify the qualifications and credentials of users who publish or comment on this site or on linked pages. Users should seek personalized advice from qualified professionals regarding all personal financial issues and evaluate the risks and applicability to their own circumstances of each financial product discussed regardless of who the publisher is or purports to be. Should you, through your use of this site, identify an individual or organization purporting to offer personalized advice, you bear all responsibility to ensure that the individual or organization has the qualifications that they may represent on the website, and that their advice is appropriate for your circumstances. On certain webpages, BestCashCow.com provides information related to rates on US-based savings accounts, CDs, short-term government bonds, and other US cash equivalent securities, also free of charge to internet users for their independent use. The accuracy of this information is not guaranteed, and the information, like all other information on this website, should not be construed to provide investment advice, nor to endorse a financial product of any sort.

© 2007 BestCashCow.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy.