Bank of America is Overpaying for Merill Lynch

Article Submitted by: JRodgers
The Economy


I just cannot figure out what they are smoking at Bank of America to pay $44 billion for Merrill.

 

Submitted: Sep 15, 2008    Views: 231    Comments: 4    Likes: 1   


It just doesn't make sense. 

On a night when they could have picked up Lehman Bros. for $1, but obviously chose not to because they couldn't get their hands around the liabilities and couldn't get the US government to provide Bear-like liability limitation, Bank of America chose to purchase Merrill for $44 billion of $29 a share.   Why?

The first thing that you do is hand it to John Thain, Merrill's CEO.  He obviously cleaned up Merrill's balance sheet to the point where it could be easily understood and the liabilities would be able to be tolerated.  But, then who knows?   Bank of America acquired Countrywide in spite of the fact that that it brought extraordinary liabilities which they did not understand.

Whether Bank of America understood the liabilities, they certainly could have picked up Merrill for a lot less than $29.  With the stock going out at $17 on Friday and Lehman's failure imminent, a $22 price would have looked very good to Merrill's shareholders this morning.  Moreover, if Ken Lewis could have waited until the market opened on Monday, Merrill would have lost half of its value and could have been bought for a song.  With Lehman gone, attention certainly would have turned to Merrill's viability.  The stock, which went out of Friday at $17, certainly would have lost half of its value would have opened at $8 and have been purchased for about $14.

The acquisition itself makes sense for so many reasons, but Bank of America shareholders need to be rubbing their chins and wondering why Bank of America overpaid by at least a factor of 2, or in this case at least $22 billion.




Related Articles:



1

Email this story Email to someone | Print Story Print Content | Add to reading list

Comments Received:

I disagree. Obviously Ken Lewis got a look at Merrill's books and realized the company was in okay shape. He wanted to move now while the markets were discounting all brokers rather than wait for things to stabilize. For a price 70% lower than what he would have paid at the beginning of year he turned Bank of America into the world's largest brokerage. Just like he turned BofA into the world's largest mortgage broker.

There may be still be some toxic stuff on Merrill's books but the folks of BofA have accounted for it I'm sure.

Posted: Sep 15, 2008

Rob
(Unregistered)

JC Flowers advised them. You can be sure that they knew what they were doing.

Posted: Sep 15, 2008

2VGrW
(Unregistered)

Don't be too upset about missing this one. BoA used a worthless currency - their own stock - so that honeymoon was brief. Merrill went out at the same price it was at before the announcement.

Posted: Sep 15, 2008

Roubini, who was pretty accurate in predicting this whole calamity thinks that BofA made a foolish move.

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/58320/Roubini-BofA%27s-Lewis-%27Totally-Overpaid%27-in-%27Reckless%27-Deal-for-Merrill?tickers=BAC,MER,LEH,GS,C,WB,WM

He thinks it now puts BofA at risk and that the other broker deals are going to have to pair up or face Lehman's fate.

Posted: Sep 15, 2008



Add Your Comments:

Your Name:

Spam protection control:


© Copyright 2008 JRodgers All rights reserved. JRodgers has granted BestCashCow.com, LLC non-exclusive rights to display this work on Bestcashcow.com.

Financial products of all nature bear inherent risks and this website is not a financial advisory service; it is a forum for users to share and to compare notes and observations on financial publications. The website provides, free of charge, the technical and logistical apparatus and the medium for users to share and to publish financial information and to comment on publications. As such, the website’s operator can not and does not take responsibility for information, observations or opinions of any sort or nature provided by third parties with whom it is not affiliated who use the website to publish, to comment or as a means of solicitation. Users are specifically warned against following any advice related to specific instruments, including, but not limited to, equity securities, that may be provided by other users directly on this site or on web pages to which other users have provided links on this site. BestCashCow.com can not and does not check or verify the qualifications and credentials of users who publish or comment on this site or on linked pages. Users should seek personalized advice from qualified professionals regarding all personal financial issues and evaluate the risks and applicability to their own circumstances of each financial product discussed regardless of who the publisher is or purports to be. Should you, through your use of this site, identify an individual or organization purporting to offer personalized advice, you bear all responsibility to ensure that the individual or organization has the qualifications that they may represent on the website, and that their advice is appropriate for your circumstances. On certain webpages, BestCashCow.com provides information related to rates on US-based savings accounts, CDs, short-term government bonds, and other US cash equivalent securities, also free of charge to internet users for their independent use. The accuracy of this information is not guaranteed, and the information, like all other information on this website, should not be construed to provide investment advice, nor to endorse a financial product of any sort.

© 2007 BestCashCow.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy.