1-Year CD Rates from Online Banks 2019

Interest rates have collapsed over the last several weeks and that may be good news for those interested in remortgaging or buying a new property.   It is also good news for anyone considering taking out a new home equity loan or line of credit or an auto loan.

It may not be good news for your savings.   Many banks dropped their online savings rates going into the July rate cut and still others are dropping their rates now based on the assumption that the Fed is not done cutting.

We are getting a lot of notes from savers who remember well a lengthy period from 2009 to 2016 when savings rates were below 1%, and are terribly fearful that we may be heading back there.   Indeed, anyone looking at Japanese or German rates and watching the talking heads on CNBC or Bloomberg can get the feeling that there is a real paradigm shift and that interest rates are never going up.

There are still banks and credit unions that are offering online 5-year CDs over 3%.   In your local market, you may even find brick and mortar opportunities at banks and credit unions to get these kinds of rates.

Here are two reasons why you should be cautious.

First, we’ve seen a panicked move in Treasuries.   Rates may not stay this low for very long.   We could be in a completely different environment in a year or 18 months with the 10-year back over 3% and perhaps even with the Fed Funds rate back over 3%.   If that happens, you will regret having limited your liquidity by locking into a long-term CD.

Second, even if rates go back to zero, you are still going to see attractive 5-year CD offers as banks will still need to lock up long-term deposits from depositors to fill their capital needs.   From 2011 until 2015, while the Fed Funds rate was at zero and the best savings rates were below 1%, it was still always possible to find 5-year CDs at or just under 2.50%.    So, even if we see a continued complete collapse in interest rates, you will always be able to get a premium for locking in for a long period.    And, yes, there is a difference between 2.50% and 3.50%, but the difference is not a matter of life or death (especially after you calculate the net income from the CD after tax).

If you see 5-year CDs as a sort of insurance against collapsing rates, then you can go ahead and devote a small amount of your savings to provide some level of protection against falling rates (be sure to check the best rates here).  But, we’d be much more inclined to direct that energy towards one-year CDs where the rates may be slightly lower, but so is the risk of getting this wrong.

I’ve written about TIAA’s “Marketsafe CD” products, and those issued by Everbank prior to its acquisition by TIAA.   I’ve suggested that the offering of these products violates the 1933 Securities Act, and I maintain that position.  More importantly, I have always written to advise depositors to avoid thinking of these products as CDs (they should not be called CDs), and I am doing that again here.   

The latest product purports to give depositors so-called “safe” exposure to the Brazilian Real, the Euro and gold and emerging market equities.   In this case, these assets are all priced using ETFs on a pricing date, and then measured against the price of those ETFs in 4 years.   The investor gets back their principal and the weighted appreciation, if any, at maturity.   Interestingly, the video, featuring Chris Gaffney, uses the hypothetical appreciation of 6% over 4 years which would underperform by at least half the compounded performance on a 4-year CD (where you can still earn well over 3% per year).

With its past products, TIAA and Everbank provided some rationale for tying their products together.   They represented earlier products as a play on oil currencies here and here a play on emerging market currencies here or emerging market equities here or a rise in interest rates here or here.  

I am not sure of the rationale for tying together the Brazilian Real, the Euro, gold and emerging market equities.   It now seems to be a kind of “we think you’ll like this” type of thing.  A prudent investor might look at which of these things they want to own and invest in them though the ETF directly or some other means.  For example, my own personal opinion is that while gold and the Euro might appreciate against the dollar over the coming 4 years, the Brazilian Real and the emerging market ETF could easily fall quite severely.    I would look at the gold ETFs (IAU or GLD) as one alternative, and interest-earning Euro accounts as another.

As anyone who has invested in any of TIAA’s or EverBank’s Marketsafe products knows, it just takes one nasty thing in the basket to destroy it and to leave you waiting for maturity to get your principal back.  Previously, however, TIAA damaged your wealth but did not hit you with a 1099 reporting Original Issue Discount (OID).    However, if you read the terms of the latest offering, TIAA will hit you with an OID statement for imputed interest in each of the four years that you are holding this product.   While the bank would have had an obligation under Federal Tax law to have reported OID, EverBank did not do this prior to its acquisition and the fact that they are now doing it means that their products go from a dreadful idea to a ever worse one.

Bottom line: Continue to avoid TIAA Marketsafe CDs.

Those paying taxes this month in States like New York, New Jersey and California have been hit with quite a wake up call over the last few days.

Our tax bills, as a result of the 2018 Republican tax cuts, are much higher, especially since we have lost all sorts of deductions for our state taxes.

Out of the woodwork are emerging two groups of people eager to present their solutions to making April 2020, as compared with this April, a little less painful:

1. Real estate agents from Florida and Texas.
2. Those pushing municipal bonds.

I have nothing bad to say about the former, and I am not going to comment about the risks and benefits of relocating to Florida or Texas (I do know that New York spends a lot of money each year checking to be sure that former NY residents have met the required criteria of residency in another state and tracking them down for past taxes where they haven’t).

Rather, I want to address the people pushing municipal bonds and municipal bond funds.    I am going to say, quite simply, that my view is that buying these instruments at this time is a terrible idea for all but the extremely wealthy.  Here are 2 reasons:

First, most people, especially now, need their liquidity and should not tie up large amounts of cash in a low interest rate environment.   One-year municipal bonds - if you can find them – in New York or California have a yield to maturity below 1.40%.   Even if you are in a 50% effective tax bracket, that is still a fully tax equivalent return of only 2.80%, and you can still get 2.80% (or better) in a 1-year CD.   Unlike municipal bonds, however, you can withdraw your money early from 1-year CDs with a reasonable early withdrawal penalty (BestCashCow recommends that you identify CDs with only three month of interest as such a penalty).   As long as you stay within FDIC and NCUA limits, your CDs bear no credit risk.   Check online CD rates here.  Check local rates at banks here and credit unions here.

Second, municipal bond interest rates are extraordinarily low.   You need to go out 30 years to find a municipal bond yielding over 3%.   As a point of comparison, I was purchasing high-quality AA New York municipals in 2009 (during the financial crisis) that were seven years in duration and were yielding over 5%.    As a general rule, I do not recommend that anyone should buy municipal bonds of more than 5 to 10 years in duration under any circumstance.   At the moment, high quality municipal bonds of those durations have tax equivalent yields that, again, do not offer significant premiums over 5-year CDs.  They also are extraordinarily  risky as they can lose tremendous value (even those of intermediate durations) should long-term rates increase.

Bottom line: Wait until you see higher long-term rates before considering municipal bonds.    

There are many people who believe that the 2008-2009 financial crisis marked a seismic shift in the interest rate paradigm and that interest rates will never go back to a pre-crisis “normal”.

When Jerome Powell became Chairman of the Federal Reserve, he seemed determined to raise rates back to a new normal long-term goal of 3%, and in fact stated that the Fed intended to raise the Fed Funds rate above that level.  But, the Fed Funds rate now sits at a target of 2.25% to 2.50%, and may not be going higher any time soon as Powell has bowed to Presidential pressure.  Some Fed governors and former Chair Janet Yellen have recently come out and said that the next Federal Reserve move could well be to cut.  And, today, Kyle Bass says that interest rates could be back to zero before the end of next year.

The idea of interest rates going back to zero concerns me, as it does many.   It is, indeed, difficult to fathom how we could finally have pulled out of this recent multi-year period where the public at large was forced into risk assets in order to avoid deterioration in their wealth, only now to be heading right back into it.

Kyle Bass is pretty smart and, while he isn’t always right, he has made some very prescient predictions in the past.   Those who can tolerate Brian Sullivan, can watch Bass’s interview here (he is largely talking about China, and doesn’t make this prediction until the end):

While Bass did not got into too much detail about how he formed his hypothesis, he did say he believes that US will experience a slowdown following a global economic slowdown beginning by the end of this year.   One might surmise that he believes the precedent is in play for the Fed to use all bullets in its resolve to fight a global economic slowdown.   The additional reality here is that interest rates around the world remain at or near zero and unless they start to move higher and stay higher, the Fed could need to move rates lower to prevent the US dollar from becoming too strong.   Plus, the President has Chair Powell’s ear and if he remains a free man, it is a certainty that he will be lobbying forcefully for as many rate cuts as possible just in front of the 2020 election

Bottom line: This could be a good time to begin to consider putting some of the cash that you cannot afford to risk into long-term time deposits (Certificates of Deposit).   Check the best 3-year CD rates, 4-year CD rates and 5-year CD rates here.

Amazingly, Jim Cramer, the biggest proponent of the stock market was interviewed on NBC’s Today show the other day and couldn't say anything other than to buy CDs.

It is a video so extraordinary that you need to watch it here.

To be clear, BestCashCow thinks that CDs should always be an important part of a well-diversified, safe portfolio.   We provide the most comprehensive list of the best online CD rates here, and we also encourage folks to look at rates at banks near them and at credit unions near them.

But, we’ve been suggesting people take extreme caution around anything longer than a year, even though two-year CD rates are now above 3% and may attract attention.   In fact, I wrote just yesterday that I do not find a one-year CD at 2.85% APY to be particularly attractive since online savings rates are strong and the Fed is still raising rates.

But, what is quite extraordinary here is that Cramer could be so easily perturbed (to put it mildly) by the recent market volatility.  This is, in fact, the same man who was encouraging people to buy into Facebook at 200, Nvidia at 290, and Amazon at 2000 in November.

I speak at conferences and extol the virtues of CDs, but I certainly wouldn’t tell people to run out of the market here, and I have no intention of unloading my Nvidia or Amazon at this time.

So what is Cramer afraid of?   I, for one, suspect he just trying to create a record of saying everything imaginable in the most vague way possible so that he can point to it and say he was right (especially if we have a 2009 scenario and he winds up on the Daily Show again).

There are several well-known online banks that are offering 1-Year CDs at 2.85%.  In fact, some banks may even be a little higher.   You can see the list of the best online 1-year CD rates here.   You may also find better one-year CD rates offered by local banks near you or credit unions near you.

BestCashCow, of course, provides the most comprehensive list of CD rates in the US.   At various points, I have highlighted what I believe to be great one-year rates.

I, however, have not been particularly eager to recommend that people get heavily into one-year CDs at 2.85% and that has caught many of BestCashCow’s readers by surprise and been the source of a lot of queries that I have received.

Here are the reasons why I would be hesitant to jump in heavily:

First, the Federal Reserve is still raising rates, most recently moving the Fed Funds rate to a range of 2.25% to 2.50%.   The Fed has also most recently guided towards a neutral rate of 2.80%.  But, they also said that there are 2 more moves in 2019 and one in 2020 and that would take the Fed Funds rate to 3.00% to 3.25% in a little over a year.

Second, I see a risk of real inflation in 2019 and into 2020 as I outlined at the end of this article.  If that happens, we are looking at higher rates and a Fed that will raising faster and higher.

Third, savings rates are pretty high and getting more so.   Even if I believe that they aren’t going higher, they really are unlikely to go lower over the next twelve months.   I count no fewer than ten nationally available online savings offerings at 2.25% and many more available at banks locally and at credit unions.   $100,000 deposited in any of those places paying 2.25% is going to deliver no more than $600 less than a one-year CD (and that $600 difference is fully taxable).   The savings account could also wind up delivering roughly the same amount or even more than a one-year CD if savings rates continue on their upward trajectory. 

Fourth, you are locking your money up and even though 1-year is a short period of time, it is still locked up.   In return for that extra fully taxable $600 (or less) on $100,000, you are locking your money up into 2020.   If you need your principal back, Sallie Mae or Live Oak Bank are going to charge you three months’ interest (other online banks, such as Marcus or Purepoint will actually charge you more to break a one-year CD).  A three-month’s interest penalty on $100,000 at 2.85% is $712.50.

If you have money that you don't need for a year, you can always put some of it into 1-year CDs.  However, if you think that there is even a remote chance that you will need the money back or that rates could go much higher, then the risk-reward of the 1-year CD just is not very exciting.   I’d stay primarily in online savings accounts.